Software → ROx |
![]() |
|
Many recent studies have compared shape-matching to docking as virtual screening tools ([1], [4], [3]). The general consensus among many of these studies is that docking tools do not address, in adequate detail, the affinity of molecules when compared to a query molecule or a pharmacaphore. The use of shape-based, ligand-oriented methods was therefore justified as an alternative method to determine this functionality. Most high-throughput shape-based screening platforms are based on the premise that molecules have similar shape if their volumes overlay well, and that a volume mismatch is more a indication of shape dissimilarity.
References
[1] P.C.D. Hawkins, A.G. Skillman, and A. Nicholls. Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 50(1):74–82, 2007. [2] Raymond J.W. Effectiveness of graph-based and fingerprint-based similarity measures for virtual screening of 2d chemical structure databases. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 16:59–71(13), January 2002. [3] Sheridan R.P., McGaughey G.B., and Cornell W.D. Multiple protein structures and multiple ligands: effects on the apparent goodness of virtual screening results. J Comput Aided Mol des., 3-4:257–65, Mar-Apr 2008. [4] Jennifer Venhorst, Sara NuŽn ez, Jan W. Terpstra, and Chris G. Kruse. Assessment of scaffold hopping efficiency by use of molecular interaction fingerprints. Journal of medicinal chemistry, May 2008. [5] P. Willett, J.M. Barnard, and G.M. Downs. Chemical similarity searching. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 38(6):983–996, 1998. |
|



